![]() ![]() Crystal DiskMark on the VM shows signifcantly lower results- less than 20% of the speed shown when Crystal is run on the physical host. I don't expect the performance of a Virtual machine to match that of the Physical host, but an 80% penalty seems quite excessive.Īctually, modern Hyper-V and multiple VHDX/NTFS layers have a miserable overhead on storage performance, so basically, you should get pretty similar numbers at the physical level and inside the virtual machine. Rebus wrote:The problem is VERY slow disk performance inside the VM guest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |